The communication timeline
Every message in a dispute is recorded in the dispute’s communication history on the Dispute tab. Each entry shows its type (dispute email sent, data request, follow-up, vendor response, and so on), the subject and body, the sender, and any attachments. While the dispute is awaiting the vendor, the panel polls for new activity and shows a Monitoring indicator with “Waiting for vendor response.” You don’t need to refresh manually.How a reply is analyzed
When a vendor reply arrives, it routes back automatically through the dispute’s encoded reply-to address, lands in the timeline, and is auto-analyzed in the background. The analysis:- Classifies the vendor’s position into one of:
- Vendor Agreed — accepted and will issue a credit or void.
- Partial Agreement — offers partial credit or an adjustment.
- Disagreed (with evidence) — rejects, but provided documentation.
- Disagreed (no evidence) — rejects without providing proof.
- Requested Information — needs more detail before responding.
- Classifies any attachments the vendor sent (for example, detecting that an attached PDF is an invoice), so an adjusted invoice can be picked up.
- Suggests a next action based on the position — typically Resolve when the vendor agreed, or Draft Follow-up otherwise.
The categorized position also appears as a chip on the vendor’s entry in the timeline, alongside the AI’s one-line summary of the reply.
Confirm or adjust the categorization
The categorization is the AI’s read of the reply, not a final decision. Review the position and summary against the actual message text, then act on the suggested next step — confirm the AI’s read by taking the suggested action, or choose a different action if you disagree.Next steps
- Follow up on a dispute — when the vendor disagrees, partially agrees, or needs more information.
- Handle an adjusted invoice — when the vendor sends a corrected invoice.
- Resolve a dispute — when the vendor agrees and you’re ready to close it out.